Case file · grounded AI SOC · powered by Anthropic Claude

The AI SOC that proves it isn't hallucinating.

DomeSOC investigates, decides, and contains threats — and an independent gate grades every claim its AI makes against the actual evidence, flagging what it can't support. Calibrated to your environment. Every action sealed in a tamper-evident audit trail.

DECISION INSPECTOR — CLAIM GROUNDINGEVIDENCE-GRADED
GroundedBrute force — 847 failed logins / 90s on CORP-WS-04 · detection.signals
GroundedMITRE T1110 — credential access · detection.mitre
GroundedSource 185.220.101.47 — external · enrichment
Unsupported"Nation-state actor" — no OTX/MISP corroboration · flagged · stripped
Unsupported"Lateral movement underway" — no adjacent-host evidence · flagged
Confidence re-capped after ungrounded claims removed → surfaced to analyst.
Every AI claim graded vs evidence
independent grounding gate · over-claim rate measured
25 live connectors · of 46 tiles
"live" = fires on a connected path
25 response actions · 7 domains
~23 execute through your connected tools
Exhibit · Grounding
The difference

Most "AI SOC" tools can't tell you when their AI is wrong.

DomeSOC can. An independent grounding gate reads every claim — from each investigation agent and the decision advisor — and grades it against the detection's actual evidence. Claims it can't support are flagged and stripped, and the analyst sees exactly what's proven, what's hypothesis, and what the AI over-reached on.

UPSTREAM GATE — PER-CLAIM VERDICTDET-7F3A
GroundedBeaconing — periodic callback 60s ± 2s · derived_evidence
GroundedDestination flagged malicious · abuseipdb 92/100
Unsupported"Exfiltration in progress" — no egress volume in evidence · stripped
GroundedSkeptic rebuttal: "no maintenance window" recognized as a rebuttal, not penalized · negation-aware
6 GROUNDED · 1 UNSUPPORTED flagged · recorded per component.

Grades, flags, and surfaces — it doesn't hide

The gate is independent of the AI it checks. Honest rebuttals ("no evidence of beaconing") are recognized as rebuttals, not penalized — so the flags you see are real over-reaches, not noise.

We measure our own over-claim rate

Every flagged claim is recorded per component and queryable. When we change a prompt, we measure whether over-claims went up or down — and only ship it if they didn't.

So you can trust the calls that matter

When the AI recommends isolating a host, you can see which claims are evidence-backed and which were stripped — before you, or your policy, act on it.

Exhibit · Investigation
Not a chatbot over your alerts

Every detection is worked by a team — then graded.

Four specialists investigate each detection in parallel, plus a devil's-advocate whose only job is to argue the benign case so nothing goes unchallenged. Their findings feed the decision advisor — and then the grounding gate grades every claim they made against the evidence.

INVESTIGATION — 4 SPECIALISTS + SKEPTIC · PARALLELSEV ≥ 2
Threat HunterBehavior → TTPs · kill-chain stage
Intel AnalystAttribution + IOC reputation — only where MISP / OTX / VirusTotal confirms
ForensicsBlast-radius + evidence-preservation priority
Skeptic ⚖Devil's advocate — argues the strongest benign / alternative case
AdvisorWeighs all five + per-tenant calibration into one recommendation, with a written rationale
Then every finding is graded by the upstream gate — the Skeptic's rebuttals recognized as rebuttals, not penalized.
Exhibit · Calibration
The moat

Threat intel says what attackers do in general. Calibration learns what's normal for you.

The gate's flags and your analysts' approve / dismiss decisions feed a per-tenant false-positive profile and entity reputation. The AI gets more precise on your environment — your noisy entities, your assets, your patterns. It's a mechanism that compounds with use, not a number we ask you to take on faith.

PER-TENANT CALIBRATION — THIS ENVIRONMENTMEASURED
reviewed alerts38
dismissed as false-positive11
entity 10.20.1.77 reputationdown-weighted ↓
FP profile measured on reviewed alerts · this environment only — not a benign-traffic rate.
Sequence · Pipeline
The loop, end to end

Ingest to contained — a full investigate → decide → ground → respond loop.

01

Investigate

Four specialist agents work the detection in parallel — plus a devil's-advocate that argues the benign case so nothing goes unchallenged.

Threat Hunter · Intel Analyst · Forensics · Skeptic
02

Decide

A decision advisor weighs the evidence, the per-tenant calibration, and the kill-chain context into a single recommendation with a written rationale.

03

Ground

Every claim — agents' and advisor's — is graded against the evidence. Unsupported claims are flagged and stripped before the decision is shown.

04

Respond

On your approval, or autonomously by your policy, containment executes through the tools you already own.

EndpointIdentityNetworkEmailCloudTicketingIntel
Exhibit · Controls
Trust & control

Built to be audited — and to keep a human in the loop until you say otherwise.

Tamper-evident

WORM evidence

Every decision and its evidence chain is hash-chained and sealed to S3 Object-Lock (compliance mode) on resolve — write-once, independently verifiable.

Per-action

Autonomy you dial

Three tiers — recommend-only, autonomous-above-threshold, full-autonomous — and you set the level independently for each response action.

No black box

Explained decisions

Every detection gets a written threat assessment; every action a plain-English reason, with the graded claims behind it.

Multi-tenant isolation · ADR-001Role-based accessMFA · SSO-ready~150k+ events/sec/core · load-tested (detection stage)
Exhibit · Integrations
Plugs into your stack

25 live connectors — they fire through tools you already run.

Response executes where your team already works. "Live" means wired to a real path — not a logo on a grid.

CrowdStrikeSentinelOneMS DefenderOktaEntra IDPalo AltoFortinetAWSGCPSplunkMS SentinelElasticQRadarProofpointMimecastDefender for O365JiraServiceNowSlackTeamsPagerDuty
OTXVirusTotalAbuseIPDBMISPthreat-intel feeds
Exhibit · Plans
Augment your team, not your budget

One tier-1 analyst costs $75k+/yr. DomeSOC Autonomous starts at $2,500/mo.

Supervised
$1,000/mo
  • AI recommends; humans approve
  • Unlimited users
  • Up to 500 detections / mo
Replaces a tier-1 analyst's triage
Autonomous
$2,500/mo
  • Contains above your confidence threshold
  • Per-action autonomy granularity
  • Unlimited events / day
Most teams start here
Full Autonomous
$15,000/mo
  • Autonomous containment, every action, your policy
  • All features unlocked
In validation with design partners
Exhibit · Founder
Built deliberately

Talk to the founder. First 3–5 design partners get 60-day trials.

Mohammad Khubaib — Founder
Autonomous decision architecture · per-tenant calibration
forensic-grade audit preservation
Patent pending — US provisional filed